MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144165159 · doi:10.1109/tcomm.2009.11.060557

A low-complexity generalized sphere decoding approach for underdetermined linear communication systems: performance and complexity evaluation

2009· article· en· W2144165159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Communications · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderdetermined systemDecoding methodsComputational complexity theoryMIMOAlgorithmMathematicsCholesky decompositionReduction (mathematics)Communication complexityRank (graph theory)Computer scienceTheoretical computer scienceEigenvalues and eigenvectorsBeamformingStatisticsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For underdetermined linear systems, original sphere decoding (SD) algorithms fail due to zero diagonal elements in the upper-triangular matrix of the QR or Cholesky factorization of the underdetermined matrix. To solve this problem, this paper presents a low-complexity generalized sphere decoding (GSD) approach by transforming the original underdetermined problem into the full-column-rank one so that standard SD can be directly applied on the transformed problem. Since the introduced transformation maintains the dimension of the original problem for all M-QAM's, the proposed GSD approach provides significant reduction in complexity as compared to other GSD schemes, especially for M-QAM with large signaling constellation. Both performance and expected complexity are analyzed to provide the comprehensive relationships between the performance and complexity of the proposed GSD and its parameters. Illustrative simulation and analytical results are in good agreement in terms of both the performance and complexity and indicate that with the properly selected design parameters, the proposed GSD scheme can approach the optimum maximumlikelihood decoding (MLD) performance with low complexity for underdetermined linear communication systems including underdetermined MIMO systems, and the proposed expected complexity analysis can be used as reliable complexity estimation for practical implementation of the proposed algorithm and serve as reference for other GSD algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it