Evidence by signal peptide trap technology for the expression of carbonic anhydrase 6 in rat incisor enamel organs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During screening of a rat incisor enamel organ cDNA library by signal peptide trap technology, we identified a DNA fragment matching a predicted translation sequence for rat carbonic anhydrase 6 (CA6). This result was unexpected because CA6, to date, has been associated primarily with secretions from glandular tissues. To further characterize this observation, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplifications were carried out on total RNA extracted from freeze-dried secretory and maturation-stage rat incisor enamel organs. A cDNA fragment of the expected size was detected in control samples from rat salivary glands as well as within maturation-stage enamel organ samples. This CA6 RT-PCR fragment was further cloned and sequenced and found to match the nucleotide sequence 770-1079 from clone XM_216584 of GenBank. Northern blot analyses with the rat CA6 cDNA fragment confirmed its expression relative to maturation-stage enamel organ samples. It is at present unclear whether the CA6 expressed by enamel organ cells is secreted into the enamel layer or into the intercellular spaces of the enamel organ itself to assist in neutralizing excess protons arising from the growth of apatite crystals during the maturation stage of amelogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".