Cigarette smoking impairs Na<sup>+</sup>-K<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity in the human coronary microcirculation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The extracellular K(+) concentration ([K(+)](o)) has been proposed to link cardiac metabolism with coronary perfusion and arrhythmogenesis, particularly during ischemia. Several animal studies have also supported K(+) as an EDHF that activates Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase and/or inwardly rectifying K(+) (K(ir)) channels. Therefore, we examined the vascular reactivity of human coronary arterioles (HCAs) to small elevations in [K(+)](o), the influence of risk factors for coronary disease, and the role of K(+) as an EDHF. Changes in the internal diameter of HCAs were recorded with videomicroscopy. Most vessels dilated to increases in [K(+)](o) with a maximal dilation of 55 ± 6% primarily at 12.5-20.0 mM KCl (n = 38, average: 16 ± 1 mM). Ouabain, a Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase inhibitor, alone reduced the dilation, and the addition of Ba(2+), a K(ir) channel blocker, abolished the remaining dilation, whereas neither endothelial denudation nor Ba(2+) alone reduced the dilation. Multivariate analysis revealed that cigarette smoking was the only risk factor associated with impaired dilation to K(+). Ouabain significantly reduced the vasodilation in HCAs from subjects without cigarette smoking but not in those with smoking. Cigarette smoking downregulated the expression of the Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase catalytic α(1)-subunit but not Kir2.1 in the vessels. Ouabain abolished the dilation in endothelium-denuded vessels to a same extent to that with the combination of ouabain and Ba(2+) in endothelium-intact vessels, whereas neither ouabain nor ouabain plus Ba(2+) reduced EDHF-mediated dilations to bradykinin and ADP. A rise in [K(+)](o) dilates HCAs primarily via the activation of Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase in vascular smooth muscle cells with a considerable contribution of K(ir) channels in the endothelium, indicating that [K(+)](o) may modify coronary microvascular resistance in humans. Na(+)-K(+)-ATPase activity is impaired in subjects who smoke, possibly contributing to dysregulation of the coronary microcirculation, excess ischemia, and arrhythmogenesis in those subjects. K(+) does not likely serve as an EDHF in the human coronary arteriolar dilation to bradykinin and ADP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".