MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144196281 · doi:10.1109/jmems.2011.2111355

Low-Stress CMOS-Compatible Silicon Carbide Surface-Micromachining Technology—Part I: Process Development and Characterization

2011· article· en· W2144196281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Microelectromechanical Systems · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal and Thin Film Mechanics
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversitySierra Wireless (Canada)Université du Québec à Montréal
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsMaterials scienceSilicon carbideSurface micromachiningFabricationOptoelectronicsSiliconCarbideEtching (microfabrication)Deposition (geology)NanotechnologyLayer (electronics)Composite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A low-temperature (<; 300 °C) low-stress microelectromechanical systems fabrication process based on a silicon carbide structural layer is presented. A partially conductive sintered target enables low-temperature dc sputtering of amorphous silicon carbide (SiC) at high deposition rates (75 nm/min). The low stress of the structural film allows for mechanically reliable structures to be fabricated, while the low-temperature deposition allows for pre-SiC metallization. The process is designed for low-cost film deposition and for complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor postintegration, stemming from chemical and thermal compatibility. Process flow, deposition, etching, and stress control are discussed, and a detailed process characterization is reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.898

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it