Twenty-one additional cases of familial renal glucosuria: absence of genetic heterogeneity, high prevalence of private mutations and further evidence of volume depletion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Familial renal glucosuria (FRG) is a rare renal tubular disorder caused by mutations within the SLC5A2 gene. It is characterized by persistent glucosuria in the absence of hyperglycaemia and any other signs of generalized tubular dysfunction. In small series of patients previously reported, the molecular and phenotypic findings in FRG families, including first hints of extracellular volume depletion and activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system induced by natriuresis, have been described. We have now extended this analysis to another 21 consecutive cases from 17 pedigrees, including 11 cases with severe glucose excretion. METHODS: Mutation analysis was performed by direct sequencing of the genomic coding segments of the SLC5A2 gene. In two cases with severe glucosuria, basal plasma renin activity and serum aldosterone concentrations were determined. RESULTS: Within the 17 pedigrees, we have identified a total of 20 different SLC5A2 mutations. Fifteen have not been previously reported. In all glucosuric individuals tested, at least one SLC5A2 mutation could be identified. Heterozygous individuals were found to have only mild glucose excretion whereas homozygous or compound heterozygous patients had severe glucosuria, ranging from 10 to 86.5 g/1.73 m(2)/24 h. In two patients of the latter group, basal plasma renin activity and serum aldosterone concentration were determined and found to be raised to an average of 4.6-fold and 3.1-fold of the upper limit of the normal range, respectively. Discussion. The identification of at least one mutated allele in every affected individual in this cohort of 17 consecutively investigated families strongly suggests that genetic heterogeneity is not prevalent in FRG. Although 5 of the detected alleles have been described previously, 15 are novel, confirming that most mutations in FRG are private. Our finding of an activation of compensatory mechanisms for salt loss may warrant more detailed studies of long-term hormonal and metabolic imbalances in patients with FRG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".