MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144290915 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2011.2124810

Compact Transformer-Based Distributed Amplifier for UWB Systems

2011· article· en· W2144290915 on OpenAlex
Aliakbar Ghadiri, Kambiz Moez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierReturn lossElectrical engineeringDistributed amplifierInductorTransformerElectrical impedanceBandwidth (computing)ChipElectric power transmissionElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceCMOSEngineeringRF power amplifierTelecommunicationsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This brief presents a new compact structure of distributed amplifiers (DAs) employing integrated transformers to lower the impedance values of input and output transmission lines. This impedance conversion allows us to employ smaller inductors for input and output transmission lines than those used in conventional DAs, resulting in a considerable saving of chip area. A fabricated five-stage DA in 0.18-μm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor technology presents an average gain of 12 dB over a bandwidth of 3.4-11 GHz. The measured input return loss is less than 9.2 dB, and the output return loss is less than 9.5 dB over the entire bandwidth. With a chip area of 0.76 mm × 0.4 mm, the amplifier consumes 38 mW from a 1.8-V direct-current power supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it