MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144325184 · doi:10.1002/cjce.21884

Recent progress in non‐precious metal catalysts for PEM fuel cell applications

2013· article· en· W2144325184 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicElectrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellFuel cellsPrecious metalCatalysisNanotechnologyElectrolyteMaterials scienceHoly GrailProcess engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMetalChemical engineeringChemistryElectrodeMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The development of non‐precious metal catalysts (NPMCs) that are practical for use at the cathode of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) would provide immense economic advantages, perpetuating the looming widespread commercialisation of these devices. NPMC materials with excellent activity towards the oxygen reduction, coupled with PEMFC performance approaching that of state‐of‐the‐art platinum catalysts brings this technology one step closer to practical application. Currently, the stability of these materials is still limited, and developing NPMC with excellent activity, performance and operational stability is the holy grail of PEMFC catalyst research. Fundamental knowledge available, along with recent progress made in this field of research will be the subject of this review paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it