MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144382935 · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2005.851338

Deadlock-free scheduling and control of flexible manufacturing cells using automata theory

2006· article· en· W2144382935 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetri netComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)AutomatonDistributed computingDeadlockJob shop schedulingSupervisory control theoryFlexible manufacturing systemMathematical optimizationSupervisory controlControl (management)Embedded systemTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel method for the scheduling and control of flexible manufacturing cells (FMCs). The approach employs automata, augmented by time labels proposed herein, for the modeling of machines, transportation devices, buffers, precedence constraints, and part routes. Ramadge-Wonham's supervisory-control theory is then used to synthesize a deadlock-free controller that is also capable of keeping track of time. For a given set of parts to be processed by the cell, A/sup */ search algorithm is subsequently employed using a proposed heuristic function. Three different production configurations are considered: Case 1) each part has a unique route; Case 2) parts may have multiple routes, but same devices in each route; and Case 3) parts may have multiple routes with different devices. The proposed approach yields optimal deadlock-free schedules for the first two cases. For Case 3, our simulations have yielded effective solutions but in practice, optimal deadlock-free schedules may not be obtainable without sacrificing computational time efficiency. One such nontime-efficient method is included in this paper. The proposed approach is illustrated through three typical manufacturing-cell simulation examples; the first adopted from a Petri-net-based scheduling paper, the second adopted from a mathematical-programming-based scheduling paper, and the third, a new example that deals with a more complex FMC scenario where parts have multiple routes for their production. These and other simulations clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed automata-based scheduling methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.710
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it