MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144383277 · doi:10.1109/e-science.2005.53

Improving GridFTP Performance with Split TCP Connections

2006· article· en· W2144383277 on OpenAlexafffund
Phil Rizk, Cameron Kiddle, Rob Simmonds

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkZeta-TCPTCP hole punchingThroughputTCP tuningDistributed computingTCP accelerationBandwidth (computing)GridHeterogeneous networkTransmission Control ProtocolOperating systemWireless networkWirelessNetwork packet

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many grid computing projects involve sharing and transferring large volumes of data. It is often important to maximise data throughput. Grid computing environments can be highly heterogeneous in nature and could involve large round trip times between collaborating sites. The actual throughput achieved could be much lower than the available bandwidth due to TCP dynamics. One technique that helps improve TCP performance in heterogeneous network environments is split TCP connections, where the connection is split at one or more points in the network. This paper examines the use of this technique for GridFTP file transfers. Results are promising showing up to four times improvement over GridFTP file transfers involving just a single end-to-end TCP connection

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207