Pamidronate Treatment of Severe Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Children under 3 Years of Age*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Severe osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a hereditary disorder characterized by increased bone fragility and progressive bone deformity. Cyclical pamidronate infusions improve clinical outcome in children older than 3 yr of age with severe OI. Because earlier treatment may have potential to prevent deformities and improve functional prognosis in young children, we studied nine severely affected OI patients under 2 yr of age (2.3-20.7 months at entry) for a period of 12 months. Pamidronate was administered i.v. in cycles of 3 consecutive days. Patients received four to eight cycles during the treatment period, with cumulative doses averaging 12.4 mg/kg. Clinical changes were evaluated regularly during treatment, and radiological changes were assessed after 6-12 months of treatment. The control group consisted of six age-matched, severely affected OI patients, who had not received pamidronate treatment. During treatment bone mineral density (BMD) increased between 86-227%. The deviation from normal, as indicated by the z-score, diminished from -6.5 +/- 2.1 to -3.0 +/- 2.1 (P < 0.001). In the control group the BMD z-score worsened significantly. Vertebral coronal area increased in all treated patients (11.4 +/- 3.4 to 14.9 +/- 1.8 cm2; P < 0.001), but decreased in the untreated group (P < 0.05). In the treated patients, fracture rate was lower than in control patients (2.6 +/- 2.5 vs. 6.3 +/- 1.6 fractures/year; P < 0.01). No adverse side-effects were noted, apart from the well known acute phase reaction during the first infusion cycle. Pamidronate treatment in severely affected OI patients under 3 yr of age is safe, increases BMD, and decreases fracture rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".