MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144409449 · doi:10.3138/jcs.40.3.120

“Civilization Had Given Him a Vote”: Citizenship and the Ballot in Sara Jeannette Duncan’s <i>The Imperialist</i>

2006· article· en· W2144409449 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Tough

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Canadian Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologySuffragePoliticsBallotArgument (complex analysis)ScholarshipDemocracyLawSocial sciencePolitical scienceVoting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay offers a reading of Sara Jeannette Duncan’s The Imperialist as a novel of citizenship. At the centre of this reading is the enfranchisement of the Moneida Indians, whose uncomprehending abuse of the ballot is contrasted by Duncan with the depth of political feeling in Lorne Murchison to produce a critique of electoral politics—and, arguably, an implicit argument for female suffrage. By critically engaging with the novel’s presentation of character and of historical events, the essay builds on existing scholarship on The Imperialist to make a case for the centrality of its political argument.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0180.028
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Canadian StudiesSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207