MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2144409694 · doi:10.1109/iembs.1990.692152

A Multi-angle Method For Deriving The Temperature Distribution In Biological Structures With Microwave Radiometry

2005· article· en· W2144409694 on OpenAlexaff
J. Montreuil, M. Nachman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiometryMicrowaveBrightness temperatureOpticsComputationMicrowave imagingTemperature measurementRadiationMaterials sciencePhysicsComputational physicsBrightnessMathematicsAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new approach for deriving the temperature distribution in biological tissues by microwave radiometry is proposed here. It consists in the measurement of the ther- mal radiation of the body, in a given frequency band, as a function of the observation angle, for two mutually orthog- onal polarizations (multi-angle method). Theoretically, this method yields results comparable to those obtained with the well known multi-spectral method. Microwave radiometry can be used to evaluate the subcuta- neous temperature distribution in biological tissues. Different configurations of tissues with different temperature distributions may produce the same radiometric signal. One solution to this problem is to perform measurements at several frequency bands (multi-spectral method); the data thus obtained have to be pro- cessed by means of inversion techniques, in order to retrieve the correct temperature profile. We propose, instead, that the mea- surement of the thermal signal of the body should be carried out in one frequency band, only, but at several observation an- gles, for two mutually orthogonal polarizations. The proposed method consists in the following three steps: a) modelling of the biological body; b) computation of the thermal signal emitted as a function of the tissue parameters; c) retrieval of the thermal field in the tissues by the inversion of the radiometric data. The biological tissues are simulated by a structure of three planar layers, with known permittivities and thicknesses, the temperature being constant within each layer (figure 1). The brightness temperature TB measured by the antenna is given in this case by:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→