MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144475678 · doi:10.1109/icw.2005.19

A Tree Division Approach to Support Local Failure Recovery for Multicasting in MPLS Networks

2005· article· en· W2144475678 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Banimelhem, Anjali Agarwal, J. William Atwood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer networkComputer scienceBackupRouterTree (set theory)Multiprotocol Label SwitchingNetwork topologyDistributed computingNode (physics)Protocol Independent MulticastInter-domainSource-specific multicastQuality of serviceEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel approach to support local failure recovery in multicast trees. Although, the presented approach can be implemented in any large backbone network that employs multicast communication mode, we concentrate our discussion on MPLS networks. In the proposed approach, a multicast tree is divided into several domains where each domain represents a sub-tree of the original one. Backup paths are built between the root of the domain and each leaf router which is called a border router. Simulation results conducted on two network topologies show the performance of the proposed approach in terms of the total capacity required for reserving the backup paths and in terms of the maximum delay needed to notify about link/node failure. The results have shown that tree division approach compared with global recovery approach reduces the time needed to notify the router that is responsible for switching the traffic to the backup path.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.533
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207