MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144483956 · doi:10.7202/001511ar

Citoyenneté et représentation dans la pensée politique de Hannah Arendt

2002· article· fr· W2144483956 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Francis Moreault

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’auteur examine la conception de la citoyenneté chez Hannah Arendt. À l’encontre de la thèse selon laquelle Arendt ne développequ’une seule représentation du citoyen, celui qui participe activement aux affaires humaines, l’auteur soutient qu’il ya aussi une pensée de la démocratie représentative chez Arendt. L’organisation du système des conseils est l’expression de cesystème représentatif chez elle. Arendt ne pense pas seulement le politique selon la tradition du républicanisme civique, ellele pense également au sein d’une pluralité d’institutions politiques constitutives du gouvernement. Arendt n’est donc pas unpenseur anarchiste dans le sens où elle voudrait abolir l’État. Elle est, au contraire, un penseur qui tient à fonder l’État sur laparticipation populaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.329
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicPhilosophy, Sociology, Political TheoryFrench-language works237,207