Pratiques des artistes en arts visuels : un terrain fécond pour une réflexion sur les contours actuels de l'engagement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé. À partir d'une recherche sur l'art engagé des artistes québécois en arts visuels, nous analysons ce que ce type particulier de contestation sociopolitique nous apprend sur les transformations qu'a subies l'engagement depuis la fin des années 1970. Nous explorons ainsi la représentation sociale de l'engagement dit passé ainsi que les caractéristiques actuelles des pratiques artisticopolitiques. Ce choix d'étudier l'engagement à partir d'une forme située hors du cadre strict de l'action usuelle, dans un espace ouvert (au sens où il ne correspond pas aux lieux, aux institutions et aux façons d'agir reconnus comme politiques), permet d'accéder à la diversité des configurations de l'engagement présent et aux déplacements et transgressions opérés quant à sa représentation plus classique. Abstract. Based on research on the politically committed art of Québécois visual artists, we analyze what this particular form of socio-political contestation teaches us about the changes which political involvement has seen since the end of the 1970s. We explore the social representation of involvement said to be that of the past, as well as the characteristics of present day artistic-political practices. The choice made to study involvement from a perspective outside of the framework of usual political action, in an open space (open in the sense of lacking correspondence with the spaces, institutions and ways of acting usually recognized as political), opens on the diversity of current forms of involvement and on the changes and transgressions which have occurred with regard to the more classical social representation of involvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.043 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".