MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144529009 · doi:10.1002/2013jb010522

Reply to comment by Denyszyn and Halls (this volume) on “Geological and geophysical observations in the Kane Basin preclude the presence of a major plate boundary in southwestern Nares Strait”

2013· article· en· W2144529009 on OpenAlexaffabout
G N Oakey, James A. Chalmers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLineationArchipelagoStructural basinPlate tectonicsOrogenyBayPaleontologyPaleogeneOceanographyGeomorphologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Paleogene movement of the Greenland Plate relative to North America took place in two stages. The movement of the Eocene stage is highly constrained by the known geometry of magnetic lineations and fracture zones in Labrador Sea and Baffin Bay. This geometry requires that the link from Baffin Bay to the Eurekan Orogeny must have been distributed deformation in the Canadian Archipelago, effectively forming an “Ellesmerian” microplate. Geophysical/geological observation in southwestern Nares Strait means that the strike‐slip movement of Greenland relative to North America during the Paleocene cannot have been through the Kane Basin but must have taken place farther northwest, probably within the Eurekan Fold Belt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0380.048
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207