Usages militants du pidgin-english au Cameroun : forces et faiblesses d’un prescriptivisme identitaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article se propose d’examiner comment l’émergence du pidgin-english induit des formes de contestations politiques et identitaires dans un pays riche de 270 langues locales. Bien qu’ignoré et combattu par les différentes administrations coloniales et postcoloniales, le pidgin a retrouvé ses lettres de noblesse au début des années 1990 et a été utilisé par divers groupes de pression politiques pour attirer l’attention des communautés camerounaises sur les difficultés d’alors. Aujourd’hui, l’usage de cette langue à part entière souffre toujours de discriminations officielles, mais son importance, tant au point de vue linguistique, qu’économique et sociopolitique est de plus en plus visible. Elle est enfin l’expression d’une identité contestataire majoritairement anglophone, que les politiciens camerounais doivent prendre en compte pour une meilleure gestion du territoire et des régions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".