MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144589906 · doi:10.1109/icc.2011.5962845

Heterogeneous Multi-Hop Transmission of Compressed ECG Data from Wireless Body Area Network

2011· article· en· W2144589906 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Song

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkHeartbeatBody area networkBluetoothNetwork packetBase stationWirelessTransmission (telecommunications)Data transmissionWireless networkReal-time computingWireless sensor networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, the healthcare market keeps growing with an increasing aging population. As a promising technology, a body area network (BAN) consisting of biomedical sensors across a human body can gather vital life signals such as electrocardiogram (ECG), pulse, and blood pressure to facilitate effective diagnosis. The BAN can be further integrated with existing wireless infrastructure to offer mHealth services. In this paper, we analyze the transmission performance of compressed ECG data over a heterogeneous multi-hop wireless channel. The ECG data from a BAN are compressed and sent through a Bluetooth-enabled ECG monitor to a smart phone and thereafter to a cellular base station. Due to potentially life-threatening situations, timely delivery of ECG data is an essential requirement. Exploiting the inherent heartbeat pattern in ECG traffic, we introduce a context-aware packetization for ECG transmission. Further, a non-preemptive priority rule is applied to mitigate the impact of background traffic and prioritize the transmission of critical ECG data. Then, we analytically evaluate the overall transmission delay of ECG packets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207