MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144616040 · doi:10.2118/153071-ms

Lessons Learned from North America and Current Status of Unconventional Gas Exploration and Exploitation in China

2012· article· en· W2144616040 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaUnconventional oilNatural gasTight gasTight oilGovernment (linguistics)Fossil fuelPetroleum engineeringDrillingBusinessEnergy securityDirectional drillingNatural resource economicsOil shaleHydraulic fracturingGeologyEngineeringEconomicsRenewable energyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Unconventional gas has been paid more and more attention since the successful exploration in North America, China is no exception. Effective exploitation of unconventional gas can guarantee energy security, optimize energy structure and help protect environment in China. Successful experiences from North America are summarized, current status of unconventional gas in China is analyzed from three aspects: resources, technologies, polices. The success of North America profits from five reasons: governmental positive policies and tax preferences, advanced technologies, adequate pipeline infrastructure, small firms leading system, large demand of natural gas. China has large potential resources of unconventional gas. As to tight gas, the prospective resources of tight gas exceed 12 trillion cubic meters. For coal-bed methane(CBM), China is ranked 3rd after Russia and Canada and has 36.8 trillion cubic meters. China has just started shale gas study and has no definite evaluation. Until now, China has developed a series of technologies. For tight gas: high-precision 2D seismic, fast drilling, slim hole drilling. As for CBM: AVO response detect, penniform multi-lateral drilling and ultra-short radius jetting drilling. China has set many beneficial policies for unconventional gas especially for CBM, now the government is working hard on making positive policies and tax preferences for shale gas. There are several differences between North America and China: geological difference, land ownership, regulatory framework, pipeline network, small firms in America and national oil companies in China. Some suggestions are proposed for China: set positive policies and tax preferences, develop advanced and adaptive technologies, consummate natural gas market system and infrastructure, cooperate with foreign companies and monitor the effect of unconventional gas exploitation on environment. These summaries and suggestions can be instructive for other countries to develop unconventional gas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.703

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it