MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144621149 · doi:10.1109/isssta.2000.876488

Performance comparison of linear MMSE and coherent RAKE receivers in multipath asynchronous random-CDMA

2002· article· en· W2144621149 on OpenAlexaff
A. Mirbagheri, Youngki Yoon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRake receiverCode division multiple accessMultipath propagationMinimum mean square errorComputer scienceAsynchronous communicationRakeElectronic engineeringDelay spreadProcess gainWidebandMultipath mitigationSpread spectrumAlgorithmMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatisticsEngineeringEstimator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the design of a linear minimum mean square error (MMSE) receiver for interference suppression in asynchronous random code-division multiple-access (random-CDMA) systems, such as IS-95 and wideband-CDMA (WCDMA), operating in multipath environments. Its performance is compared with that of the coherent RAKE receiver. The figure of merit is average output signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR). The proposed receiver maximizes SNR and considers all the desired user's paths unlike the standard RAKE receiver which selects a subset of them. The performance improvement is supported and quantified by numerical examples. The achieved gain is shown to be substantial in nonuniform power conditions (typical of next-generation CDMA systems) and dense multipath environments where the signals are received via many paths. The chip pulse shape is the square-root raised cosine (Sqrt-RC) pulse with 22% excess bandwidth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207