Hsp90 cochaperones p23 and FKBP4 physically interact with hAgo2 and activate RNA interference–mediated silencing in mammalian cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Argonaute proteins and small RNAs together form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), the central effector of RNA interference (RNAi). The molecular chaperone Hsp90 is required for the critical step of loading small RNAs onto Argonaute proteins. Here we show that the Hsp90 cochaperones Cdc37, Aha1, FKBP4, and p23 are required for efficient RNAi. Whereas FKBP4 and p23 form a stable complex with hAgo2, the function of Cdc37 in RNAi appears to be indirect and may indicate that two or more Hsp90 complexes are involved. Our data also suggest that p23 and FKBP4 interact with hAgo2 before small RNA loading and that RISC loading takes place in the cytoplasm rather than in association with RNA granules. Given the requirement for p23 and FKBP4 for efficient RNAi and that these cochaperones bind to hAgo2, we predict that loading of hAgo2 is analogous to Hsp90-mediated steroid hormone receptor activation. To this end, we outline a model in which FKBP4, p23, and Aha1 cooperatively regulate the progression of hAgo2 through the chaperone cycle. Finally, we propose that hAgo2 and RNAi can serve as a robust model system for continued investigation into the Hsp90 chaperone cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".