MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144677370 · doi:10.1002/syn.20210

Dopamine agonist action of phencyclidine

2005· article· en· W2144677370 on OpenAlexaff
Philip Seeman, Mercedes Lasaga

Bibliographic record

VenueSynapse · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhencyclidinePsychotomimeticDopamineAgonistPharmacologyDopamine agonistDopamine receptorNeuroscienceChemistryPsychologyDopaminergicReceptorInternal medicineMedicineNMDA receptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although the psychotomimetic action of phencyclidine is often used to model a hypoglutamate theory of psychosis or schizophrenia, work also exists showing that phencyclidine has a significant affinity for the dopamine D2 receptor. The present study was done to determine whether phencyclidine has a direct functional dopamine-like action on cells. The effect of phencyclidine was tested on the release of prolactin from rat cultured anterior pituitary cells. It was found that the release of prolactin was 50% inhibited by 4 nM phencyclidine. This strong dopamine-like agonist action at the functional high-affinity state of the dopamine D2 receptor by the phencyclidine psychotomimetic is consistent with the dopamine hypothesis of psychosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynapseSame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207