MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determination of nitrite and nitrate in a proposed certified reference material for nutrients in seawater by capillary zone electrophoresis with artificial seawater as the background electrolyte using transient isotachophoresis

2002· article· en· W2144678167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Keiichi Fukushi, Takashi Miyado, Nobuhiro Ishio, Hideaki Nishio, Keiitsu Saito, Sahori Takeda, Shin‐ichi Wakida

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrophoresis · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotachophoresisCapillary electrophoresisNitriteSeawaterChemistryCertified reference materialsNitrateDetection limitElectrolyteChromatographyChlorideAnalytical Chemistry (journal)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a combination of selected ions as a terminating ion which is useful for transient isotachophoresis (ITP) in capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE) for the determination of nitrite and nitrate in seawater. In addition to 150 mM sulfate as the principal terminating ion, 10 mM bromate was added to a sample solution as the additional terminating ion. Artificial seawater containing 3 mM cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) was adopted as a background electrolyte (BGE). The limits of detection (LODs) for nitrite and nitrate were 2.2 and 1.0 microg/L (as nitrogen), respectively. The LODs were obtained at a signal to noise ratio (S/N) of 3. The values of the relative standard deviation (RSD) of peak area for these ions were 1.9 and 1.4%. The RSDs of peak height were 1.7 and 1.9%, the RSDs of migration time 0.11%. The proposed method was applied to the determination of nitrite and nitrate in a proposed certified reference material for nutrients in seawater, MOOS-1, distributed by the National Research Council of Canada (NRC). The results almost agreed with the assigned tolerance interval.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrophoresisSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207