MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144735233 · doi:10.1109/iccs.2004.1359406

A policy plane for IP-optical networks

2004· article· en· W2144735233 on OpenAlexaff
N. Rico, Omar Cherkaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Optical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkConvergence (economics)Computer scienceAutomatically switched optical networkSignaling protocolDistributed computingForwarding planeOptical IP SwitchingRouting control planeThe InternetInternet ProtocolWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a push towards convergence of optical and Internet transport infrastructures, where the network end to end runs a single homogeneous control and signaling plane. For practical reasons the convergence happens in phases, from overlay networks via optical-UNI (user-to-network interface) signaling between domains, to routing and signaling between domains, towards a model of homogenous routing and signaling end to end via GMPLS (generalized multi-protocol label switching). Complex policy control is required for proper functioning and management of different network architectures introduced by various phases of the convergence. In this paper, we present a policy plane that controls and manages a heterogeneous, multi-domain, and converged optical and IP network

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207