Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis la parution de Minorités francophones : assimilation et vitalité des communautés dans la série Nouvelles perspectives canadiennes du ministère du Patrimoine canadien, les études se multiplient qui visent à racheter l’assimilation des minorités francophones en plaçant plutôt l’accent sur leur vitalité linguistique ou culturelle. Dans sa contribution en ce sens au récent numéro de Recherches sociographiques sur le thème des minorités, André Langlois a prétendu remettre en question le paradigme de l’urbanisation comme catalyseur de l’assimilation et celui de la concentration territoriale comme condition nécessaire à la persistance linguistique d’une minorité. La présente note met en évidence d’importantes lacunes et faiblesses dans la méthode et le raisonnement de Langlois, tout en faisant ressortir à quel point les recensements confirment les paradigmes mis en cause.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".