MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144765310 · doi:10.1139/b07-064

Genetic variation in two<i>Chamaecrista</i>species (Leguminosae), one endangered and narrowly distributed and another widespread in the Serra do Espinhaço, Brazil

2007· article· en· W2144765310 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Reinaldo Moreira da Silva, Geraldo Wilson Fernandes, Maria Bernadete Lovato

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
KeywordsBiologyGenetic diversityEndangered speciesRange (aeronautics)Genetic variationEcologyBotanyHabitatPopulationZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Serra do Espinhaço in Brazil is under continuous and increasing levels of human disturbance. It has a large number of endemic plant species such as Chamaecrista semaphora (Irwin and Barneby), an endangered species with extremely narrow range. We studied the genetic diversity of C. semaphora and compared it with Chamaecrista mucronata (Spreng.) Irwin and Barneby, a widespread congeneric species distributed over the entire Serra do Espinhaço, in an attempt to provide information for conservation strategies. Two populations of C. mucronata and the only two known populations of C. semaphora from Serra do Cipó were screened for variability using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Populations of C. semaphora exhibited a lower percentage of polymorphic markers (16.9%) and Shannon’s Diversity Index (H′pop= 0.124) than C. mucronata populations (43.3% and H′pop= 0.299). Most of the genetic variability of both species studied was distributed within populations; C. semaphora populations (ΦST= 0.198) were less divergent than C. mucronata populations (ΦST= 0.378). The risk of extinction for C. semaphora is large owing to its low level of genetic diversity compared with its widespread congener and because of increasing habitat destruction. Both populations of C. semaphora urgently need protection to maximize the genetic diversity of this species and diminish further substantial loss within the populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207