MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144767588 · doi:10.5430/jst.v2n1p43

Breast cancer tumor markers

2012· article· ru· W2144767588 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Solid Tumors · 2012
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Cells and Metastasis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerCancerOncologyInternal medicineGynecologyClinical PracticeDiseaseFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast cancer is one of the most common cancer in women, presented with a lump and skin colour change, is one of thecommonest cancer in women. A wide variety of tumor markers viz. uPA, BRCA1 & 2, Ki76, ER, PR, HER etc. are usedfor establishing carcinoma of breast but none being a proper diagnostic tool for early detection, though each one has itsown prognostic value. Though proposed but only few are used in clinical practice, research studies are still ongoing toidentify and establish new biochemical parameters/markers that can be of used not only in advanced disease, but also inearly stages of the diagnostic workup of breast cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Solid TumorsSame topicCancer Cells and MetastasisFrench-language works237,207