β-Alanine-Based Dendritic β-Peptides: Dendrimers Possessing Unusually Strong Binding Ability Towards Protic Solvents and Their Self-Assembly into Nanoscale Aggregates through Hydrogen-Bond Interactions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of poly(beta-alanine) dendrimers 1-4 with Boc-carbamate as the surface functionality, beta-alanine as the dendritic branch, 3,5-diaminobenzoic acid as the branching agent, and 1,2diaminoethane as the interior core has been synthesized by a solution-phase peptide-coupling method. The structural identities and purities of the products have been fully characterized by spectroscopic and chromatographic methods. 1H NMR studies on the dendrimers indicated that the Boc-carbamate surface groups exist as a mixture of syn and anti rotamers in solution, and that the dendrimers adopt an open structure in polar solvents; this allows the free interaction of the interior core functionality with solvent molecules. Due to the cooperative effect of a large number of carbamate and amide groups, the dendrimers exhibit an unusually strong binding ability towards protic solvents and behave as H-bond sponges. As a result, the H/D exchange rates of the N-H protons are significantly enhanced in such dendritic structures, as compared to those of nondendritic carbamates and amides. These dendritic peptide dendrimers also exhibit a strong tendency to form nanoscopic aggregates in nonpolar or polar aprotic solvents through intermolecular H-bond interactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it