Macrophages from BALB/c and CBA/Ca mice differ in their cellular responses to <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BALB/c and CBA/Ca mice, which are resistant and susceptible respectively to pneumococcal infection exhibit key differences in macrophage expression of TLR9 and cytokine production. In a mouse model of pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, differences in the timing and vigor of the host inflammatory response have been associated with susceptibility to invasive disease. BALB/c and CBA/Ca mice are known to be resistant and susceptible to acute pneumococcal disease, respectively. In this study, we have demonstrated that BMM from BALB/c and CBA/Ca mice differ in their expression and regulation of TLR9 in response to S. pneumoniae. We have also shown that BMM from CBA/Ca mice failed to fully activate p38, NF-κB, and ERK 1/2 signaling pathways, resulting in reduced secretion of TNF-α and CCL5 in response to this pathogen. In addition, we have established that S. pneumoniae induced significant cell death in BMM from CBA/Ca mice. These findings indicate that variations between the two strains are likely to reflect differences in macrophage responses to the pathogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".