MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144871245 · doi:10.1109/tcst.2008.922506

Tracking Control of an Antagonistic Shape Memory Alloy Actuator Pair

2008· article· en· W2144871245 on OpenAlexaff
Mehrdad Moallem, V.A. Tabrizi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicShape Memory Alloy Transformations
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSMA*Shape-memory alloyControl theory (sociology)ActuatorNonlinear systemMiniaturizationTorqueController (irrigation)Materials scienceComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)PhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shape memory alloy actuators exhibit significant nonlinearities in their stress-strain-temperature characteristics which makes them difficult to control. This brief presents a control scheme for trajectory tracking using torque control of shape memory alloy (SMA) actuators connected to a rotary load in an antagonistic configuration. Despite possessing interesting properties such as large force to mass ratio, possibility of miniaturization, light weight, and quiet actuation, SMA exhibits undesirable characteristics that should be taken into account when utilizing them as actuators. The undesirable characteristics include hysteresis, nonlinear temperature dependencies, and slow response. By considering the nonlinear behavior and thermal characteristics of SMA, an inversion-based control scheme with time-varying gains is developed in this brief. The proposed controller does not depend on characteristics of SMA wire and only an approximate model is sufficient. The controller performance is further evaluated on an experimental setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Control Systems TechnologySame topicShape Memory Alloy TransformationsFrench-language works237,207