MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144876666 · doi:10.7202/044595ar

On Photography. The Medium, The Scandal and The Silence

2010· article· en· W2144876666 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giovanni Fiorentino

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sémiotiques · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicVisual Culture and Art Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotographySnapshot (computer storage)SilencePhotojournalismArtVisual artsObject (grammar)Art historyHistoryAestheticsPhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Italo Calvino once referred to photography as an “anthropologically new object”, while Roland Barthes described it as a “bizarre medium”. In all accounts photography can be seen to resist our attempts to theorize it. Accepting this challenge, the present essay seeks to investigate the specificity of photography with reference to three concepts and pairs of authors: These concepts are then used to consider three photographs: a snapshot taken by an American soldier deployed in Iraq between 2003 and 2004; Le croci di Guerra (1991) by Oliviero Toscani for Benetton; and Dead Troops Talk (1992) by Jeff Wall.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.493
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sémiotiquesSame topicVisual Culture and Art TheoryFrench-language works237,207