Residual quadrupole interaction in brain and its effect on quantitative sodium imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sodium MRI is particularly interesting given the key role that sodium ions play in cellular metabolism. To measure concentration, images must be free from contrast unrelated to sodium density. However, spin 3/2 NMR is complicated by more than rapid biexponential signal decay. Residual quadrupole interactions (described by frequency ωQ) can reduce Mxy development during RF excitation. Three experiments, each performed on the same four healthy volunteers, demonstrate that residual quadrupole interactions are of concern in quantitative sodium imaging of the brain. The first experiment shows a reliable increase in the rate of excitation 'flipping' (1%-6%), particularly in white matter with tracts running superior-inferior (i.e. parallel to B0). Increased flip-rates imply an associated signal loss and are to be expected when ωQ ~ ω1. The second experiment shows that a prescribed flip-angle decrease from 90° to 20°, with concomitant decrease in TE from 0.25 ms to 0.10 ms and no T1 weighting, results in a 14%-26% saline calibration phantom normalized signal (SN) increase in the white matter regions. The third experiment shows that this (SN) increase is primarily due to a residual quadrupole effect, with a small contribution from T2 weighting. There is an observed deviation from the spin 3/2 biexponential curve, also suggesting ωQ dephasing. Using simulation to explain the results of all three experiments, a model of brain tissue is hypothesized. It includes one pool (50%) with ωQ = 0, and another (50%) in which ωQ has a Gaussian distribution with a standard deviation of 625 Hz. Given the result of the second experiment, it is suggested that the use of reduced flip-angles with large ω1 will provide more accurate measures of sodium concentration than 'standard' methods using 90° pulses. Alternatively, further study of sodium ωQmay provide a means to explore tissue structure and organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".