MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144910248 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118698

HerMES: deep number counts at 250 <i>μ</i>m, 350 <i>μ</i>m and 500 <i>μ</i>m in the COSMOS and GOODS-N fields and the build-up of the cosmic infrared background

2012· article· en· W2144910248 on OpenAlexaff
M. Béthermin, E. Le Floc’h, O. Ilbert, A. Conley, G. Lagache, A. Amblard, V. Arumugam, S. Berta, J. J. Bock, A. Boselli, V. Buat, Caitlin M. Casey, N. Castro-Rodríguez, A. Cava, D. L. Clements, Asantha Cooray, C. D. Dowell, S. Eales, D. Farrah, A. Franceschini, J. Glenn, M. Griffin, E. Hatziminaoglou, S. Heinis, E. Ibar, R. J. Ivison, Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe, L. Levenson, G. Magdis, L. Marchetti, G. Marsden, H. T. Nguyen, B. O’Halloran, Seb Oliver, A. Omont, M. J. Page, P. Panuzzo, A. Papageorgiou, C. P. Pearson, I. Pérez‐Fournon, M. Pohlen, D. Rigopoulou, I. G. Roseboom, M. Rowan-Robinson, M. Salvato, B. Schulz, D. Scott, N. Seymour, D. L. Shupe, A. J. Smith, M. Symeonidis, M. Trichas, K. E. Tugwell, M. Vaccari, I. Valtchanov, J. D. Vieira, M. Viero, L. Wang, C. K. Xu, M. Zemcov

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of British Columbia
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyImperial College LondonNational Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesUK Space AgencyCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales
KeywordsSpire (mollusc)RedshiftPhysicsAstrophysicsGalaxySource countsCOSMIC cancer databaseAstronomyPopulationConfusionCosmic infrared backgroundFlux (metallurgy)Cosmic microwave backgroundOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aims. The Spectral and Photometric Imaging REceiver (SPIRE) onboard the Herschel space telescope has provided confusion limited maps of deep fields at 250 μm, 350 μm, and 500 μm, as part of the Herschel Multi-tiered Extragalactic Survey (HerMES). Unfortunately, due to confusion, only a small fraction of the cosmic infrared background (CIB) can be resolved into individually-detected sources. Our goal is to produce deep galaxy number counts and redshift distributions below the confusion limit at SPIRE wavelengths (~20 mJy), which we then use to place strong constraints on the origins of the cosmic infrared background and on models of galaxy evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.556

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations229
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207