MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2144947977 · doi:10.1109/fccm.2011.27

Scalable, High Performance Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: Why FPGAs and Not GPGPUs

2011· article· en· W2144947977 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Li, Marinko V. Šarunic, Lesley Shannon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Coherence Tomography Applications
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayScalabilityOptical coherence tomographyGeneral-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsPipeline (software)Parallel computingCUDASupercomputerComputational scienceComputer hardwareComputer graphics (images)OpticsGraphics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (FD-OCT) is an emerging biomedical imaging technology featuring ultra-high resolution and fast imaging speed. Due to the complexity of the FD-OCT algorithm, real time FD-OCT imaging demands high performance computing platforms. However, the scaling of real-time FD-OCT processing for increasing data acquisition rates and 3-dimensional (3D) imaging is quickly outpacing the performance of general purpose processors. Our research analyzes the scalability of accelerating FD-OCT processing on two potential implementation platforms: General Purpose Graphical Processing Units (GPGPUs) and Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs). We implemented a complete FD-OCT system using a NVIDIA GPGPU as co-processor, with a speed up of 6.9x over general purpose processors (GPPs). We also created a hardware processing engine using FPGAs with a speed up of 15.5x over GPPs for a single pipeline, which can be replicated to further increase performance. Our analysis of the performance and scalability for both platforms shows that, while GPGPUs offer an easy and low cost solution for accelerating FD-OCT, FPGAs are more likely to match the long term demands for real-time, 3D, FD-OCT imaging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Coherence Tomography ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207