Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une relecture de La Terre et le Sang de Mouloud Feraoun qui y décèle la genèse d’un dire littéraire hybride surgi d’un entre-deux. Avec en toile de fond l’histoire de la littérature algérienne et, plus généralement, de la littérature maghrébine, il revisite ce qui a permis à la critique d’ériger Nedjma de Kateb Yacine comme œuvre symbole de la rupture avec le modèle romanesque européen. Il appert alors que la question commune posée par les deux romans est celle de l’invention d’un nouveau récit identitaire reposant dans les deux cas sur un sacrifice tragique.This article proposes a re-reading of Mouloud Feraoun’s La Terre et le Sang, which reveals the origins of a hybrid literary expression born from a location in-between. Against the backdrop of the history of Algerian literature and, more generally, of North African literature, it revisits the reasons critics elevated Kateb Yacine’s Nedjma as symbolic of the rupture with the European model of fiction. It appears, then, that the question common to both novels is that of the invention of a new story of an identity that, in both cases, rests upon a tragic sacrifice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".