Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’oeuvre d’Hergé, auteur de Tintin, s’est constituée parallèlement à la période de transition entre le cinéma muet et le parlant. Le cinéma des premiers temps, auquel fut exposé Hergé, n’était d’ailleurs pas aussi silencieux qu’on l’a prétendu puisque, par ses bonimenteurs, il participait à la tradition orale. Constatant que le passage vers un cinéma parlant n’est pas une simple évolution, mais bien une mutation du média cinématographique, on cherche donc à retracer selon quelles modalités la bande dessinée a pu être influencée par cette transformation. Dans cette optique, l’auteur du présent article scrute les traces de l’influence du cinéma oral sur les premiers travaux d’Hergé, et analyse l’évolution de ces travaux à l’aune de la complexité du passage au cinéma parlant. Il montre ainsi dans quelle mesure l’héritage du cinéma oral se manifeste dans les premiers albums de Tintin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".