MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145004969 · doi:10.1109/twc.2006.1633359

Joint source-channel turbo coding for binary Markov sources

2006· article· en· W2145004969 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceTurbo codeAlgorithmDecoding methodsNoisy-channel coding theoremTurbo equalizerRayleigh fadingAdditive white Gaussian noiseInterleavingEncoderTurboMarkov chainMarkov processTheoretical computer scienceFadingChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsConcatenated error correction codeMathematicsBlock codeStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the construction of joint source-channel (JSC) turbo codes for the reliable communication of binary Markov sources over additive white Gaussian noise and Rayleigh fading channels. To exploit the source Markovian redundancy, the first constituent turbo decoder is designed according to a modified version of Berrou's original decoding algorithm that employs the Gaussian assumption for the extrinsic information. Due to interleaving, the second constituent decoder is unable to adopt the same decoding method; so its extrinsic information is appropriately adjusted via a weighted correction term. The turbo encoder is also optimized according to the Markovian source statistics and by allowing different or asymmetric constituent encoders. Simulation results demonstrate substantial gains over the original (unoptimized) Turbo codes, hence significantly reducing the performance gap to the Shannon limit. Finally, we show that our JSC coding system considerably outperforms tandem coding schemes for bit error rates smaller than 10/sup -4/, while enjoying a lower system complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it