MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145050101 · doi:10.1109/cnsr.2007.5

A Novel Approach for Frequent Phrase Mining in Web Search Engine Query Streams

2007· article· en· W2145050101 on OpenAlexafffund
M. Barouni-Ebarhimi, Ali A. Ghorbani

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersAtlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
KeywordsComputer sciencePhraseSet (abstract data type)Data stream miningData miningInformation retrievalRecommender systemPhrase searchData streamWeb query classificationWeb search querySearch engineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, conceptual frequency rate, a new frequency definition suitable for query stream mining, is introduced. An online single-pass algorithm called OFSD (Online Frequent Sequence Discovery) is given, to mine the set of all conceptual frequent sequences in a data stream whose conceptual frequency rates satisfy a minimum user defined frequency rate. Phrase recommender algorithm is then described based on the set of conceptual frequent phrases extracted by the OFSD algorithm. We have also designed a query recommender algorithm, OQD (Online Query Discovery). OQD is used for comparison purposes along side the proposed phrase recommender algorithm. Simulation results show the efficiency of the proposed Phrase recommender algorithm compared to OQD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207