MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2145100347 · doi:10.1086/312789

Measuring the Ionization of O Star Winds

2000· article· en· W2145100347 on OpenAlexaff
L. Bianchi, J. B. Hutchings, A. W. Fullerton, D. C. Morton, Raymond G. Ohl, G. Sonneborn, D. Massa, Kenneth R. Brownsberger, A. J. Willis

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsMetallicityStarsIonizationO-type starSpectral lineGalaxyAstronomySupergiantIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an analysis of wind line profiles from Far Ultraviolet Spectroscopic Explorer ( FUSE ) spectra of two O7 supergiants in the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (Sk -67°111 and AV 232, respectively). Model fits yield the column densities of S IV, S VI, P IV, P V, N III, and N IV, providing the first direct measurement of the ionization balance in stellar winds. The ratios of S IV/S VI and P IV/P V are consistently lower in the LMC star. IUE and Hubble Space Telescope archival spectra are also used to measure N IV and N V, but the much higher optical depth makes the N V measurements inconclusive. The velocity and optical depth distributions in the wind are qualitatively similar between the two stars, when scaled to their terminal velocities. The terminal velocities are different, with AV 232 being lower (as found previously in SMC stars and linked to lower metallicity). These are the first results from a program to investigate wind ionization and velocity structure among hot stars in local galaxies, and they demonstrate the higher accuracy in measuring column densities of less abundant ions, such as phosphorus and sulfur, observable in the FUSE range.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→