MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145104519 · doi:10.1139/l02-017

The effect of sharp-crested weir shape on air entrainment

2002· article· en· W2145104519 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ahmet Baylar, M. Emin Emiroğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyFirat Üniversitesi
KeywordsWeirAir entrainmentEntrainment (biomusicology)AerationHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceJet (fluid)GeologyMechanicsGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aeration in the waters of rivers and streams is very important to the quality and existence of aquatic life. If the overfall jets downstream of weir structures plunges into a plunge pool, entrained air bubbles will contribute to aeration. This paper investigates sharp-crested weirs having different cross-sectional geometry and their effect on the air entrainment rate. It is demonstrated that the air entrainment rate of a 30° triangular sharp-crested weir is better than that of the other sharp-crested weirs tested. Moreover, variation in the number of V-notches over the width of the weir plate was studied for 30° triangular sharp-crested weirs. The 30° triangular sharp-crested weir with two V-notches was found to have higher values of air entrainment rate.Key words: aeration, air entrainment rate, plunging overfall jet, sharp-crested weir.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.156
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207