MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145105091 · doi:10.1287/opre.2014.1285

Quantity Premiums and Discounts in Dynamic Pricing

2014· article· en· W2145105091 on OpenAlexaff
Yuri Levin, Mikhail Nediak, Андрей Бажанов

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonopolistic competitionDynamic pricingRevenue managementOrder (exchange)Product (mathematics)Monotonic functionMicroeconomicsRevenueHolding costEconomicsInventory controlEconometricsMathematicsOperations managementMonopolyFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a dynamic pricing problem for a monopolistic company selling a perishable product when customer demand is both uncertain and occurs in batches that must be fulfilled as a whole. The seller can price-discriminate between different sized batches by setting different unit prices. The problem is modeled as a stochastic optimal control problem to find an inventory-contingent dynamic pricing policy that maximizes the expected total revenues. We find the optimal pricing policy and prove several monotonicity results. First, we establish stochastic order conditions on the unit willingness-to-pay distributions that determine when quantity discounts or premiums take place for a batch purchase compared to a rapid sequence of purchases with the same total size. Second, we give sufficient conditions for prices to be monotonically decreasing or increasing in inventory. Third, we characterize the conditions for the perceived quantity discounts and premiums that result from comparing unit prices for different batch sizes under a particular inventory level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.563

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOperations ResearchSame topicSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementFrench-language works237,207