"Canto de madre": la revuelta femenina a flor de piel en el Canto Popular Uruguayo del dúo Washington Carrasco y Cristina Fernández
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo de investigacion examina la relacion entre texto y musica y la incorporacion delenunciado de la mujer en la trayectoria del duo Cristina Fernandez y Washington Carrasco. Integradoen 1976, y perteneciendo a la segunda generacion del Canto Popular Uruguayo (CPU,1973-1985), el duo es reconocido por la constante presencia de musicalizaciones de poesia iberoamericanaen sus actuaciones y grabaciones sonoras. Su interpretacion de “Canto de madre”(Juan Zorrilla de San Martin) afirma un querer “trabajar con la palabra” en su proceso creativopara articular la expresion identitaria y la integracion de la cantora como portavoz del topos, lahistoricidad cultural y el lugar del enunciado la mujer dentro del CPU. Basado en el caso particularde este poema musicalizado, el articulo se enfoca en como se vuelven a articular los conceptosidentitarios constantemente, a la vez que se cuestiona, en terminos de lo que Julia Kristeva denominala “revuelta” y la revolucion posible del lenguaje poetico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it