Le guerrier sculpté en France de 1871 à 1914 ou le triomphe de l’héroïsme anonyme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La défaite de Sedan a eu de profondes conséquences sur l’image du guerrier dans la sculpture française entre 1871 et 1914. D’un côté, on voit se multiplier les effigies de guerriers anciens, recrutés dans les époques les plus glorieuses de l’histoire nationale, qu’ils soient célèbres comme Vercingétorix et Jeanne d’Arc, ou oubliés comme le Grand Ferré et le Tambour d’Arcole. De l’autre, on observe, au sein des œuvres commémorant plus directement la Guerre de 1870, une nette prédilection pour la figure du soldat anonyme, qu’il soit nu ou vêtu, et pour les groupes de mobiles représentés au combat afin de glorifier cet « Achille collectif qu’on appelle un régiment » (Théophile Gautier). L’ensemble de ce corpus traduit une profonde mutation de la notion d’héroïsme, qui conduit moins à « l’abolition du Culte des Héros » plutôt qu’à l’émergence de « tout un Monde de Héros », pour reprendre la prédiction formulée en 1840 par Thomas Carlyle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".