MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145176499 · doi:10.1093/molehr/gal025

Gene regulation of neurokinin B and its receptor NK3 in late pregnancy and pre-eclampsia

2006· article· en· W2145176499 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nigel Page

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Human Reproduction · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMedical Research Council CanadaUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsBiologyNeurokinin BPregnancyReceptorGeneEndocrinologyInternal medicineAndrologyGeneticsNeuropeptideMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elevated circulating levels of the tachykinin, neurokinin B (NKB), have been observed in women with pre-eclampsia during the third trimester of pregnancy. Currently, the molecular mechanisms responsible for these increased levels remain unknown. To understand the molecular regulation, we have compared the differences in gene expression of the tachykinins and their receptors in control and pre-eclamptic placentae and the responses of the TAC3 gene encoding NKB to proposed physiological triggers of pre-eclampsia including hypoxia and oxidative stress using real-time quantitative PCR. We have determined the placenta to be the main site of TAC3 expression with levels 2.6-fold higher than the brain. TAC3 expression was found to be significantly higher in pre-eclamptic placenta (1.7-fold, P < 0.05) than in normal controls. No evidence was found that hypoxia and oxidative stress were responsible for increases in TAC3 expression. In rat placenta, a longitudinal study in normal late pregnancy was associated with a significant down-regulation of the NKB/NK3 ligand-receptor pair (P < 0.05). The present data suggest that the increased placental expression of TAC3 is part of the mechanism leading to the increased circulating levels of NKB in pre-eclampsia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Human ReproductionSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207