MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145193793 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.2009.5441970

Imaging the auditory system: A new application of high-frequency ultrasound

2009· article· en· W2145193793 on OpenAlexaff
Zahra Torbatian, Rob Adamson, René Van Wijhe, Ronald J. E. Pennings, Manohar Bance, Jeremy Brown

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOssiclesMiddle earBasilar membraneUltrasoundCochleaInner earMaterials scienceBiomedical engineeringAuditory systemHigh frequency ultrasoundAcousticsTemporal boneEar canalRound windowAnatomyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work describes an ex-vivo imaging study of the auditory system using high-frequency ultrasound. Tissue structures relevant to hearing disorders were imaged using a realistic in-vivo approach and a custom built 50 MHz annular-array imaging system. Images were generated of the middle ear and features of the tympanic membrane and ossicles could be visualized. Images were also generated of the inner ear where the basilar membrane could be visualized. The comparison of ultrasound images with ¿post-imaging¿ microscopic photos showed that features of the ossicles and the cochlea agreed with the ultrasound images. A 1 mm diameter Doppler probe has also been fabricated and pulsed-wave Doppler measurements were performed through the round window membrane on a fresh in-tact temporal bone as sound was applied to the ear canal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207