MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145208701 · doi:10.1109/icnp.2000.896301

Time-lined TCP for the TCP-friendly delivery of streaming media

2002· article· en· W2145208701 on OpenAlexaff
Biswanath Mukherjee, Tim Brecht

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceUnicastComputer networkTCP Friendly Rate ControlReal Time Streaming ProtocolNetwork congestionCompound TCPThe InternetNetwork packetOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces time-lined TCP (TLTCP). TLTCP is a protocol designed to provide TCP-friendly delivery of time-sensitive data to applications that are loss-tolerant, such as streaming media players. Previous work on unicast delivery, of streaming media over the Internet proposes using UDP and performs congestion control at the user level by regulating the application's sending rate. TLTCP, on the other hand is intended to be implemented at the transport level, and is based on TCP with modifications to support time-lines. Instead of treating all data as a byte stream TLTCP allows the application to associate data with deadlines. TLTCP sends data in a similar fashion to TCP with the deadline for a section of data has elapsed; at which point the now obsolete data is discarded in favor of new data. As a result, TLTCP supports TCP-friendly delivery of streaming media by retaining much of TCP's congestion control functionality. We describe an API for TLTCP that involves augmenting the recvmsg and sendmsg socket calls. We also describe how streaming media applications that use various encoding schemes like MPEG-1 can associate data with deadlines and use TLTCP's API. We use simulations to examine the behavior of TLTCP under a wide range of networks and workloads. We find that it indeed performs time-lined data delivery and under most circumstances the bandwidth is shared equally, among completing TLTCP and TCP flows. Moreover those scenarios under which TLTCP appears to be unfriendly are those under which TCP flows competing only with other TCP flows do not share bandwidth equitably.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207