MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145237970 · doi:10.5081/jgps.7.1.46

A Novel Architecture for Ultra-Tight HSGPS-INS Integration

2008· article· en· W2145237970 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Global Positioning Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureComputer scienceMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global Positioning System (GPS) currently fulfills the positioning requirements of many applications under Line-Of-Sight (LOS) environments. However, many Location-Based Services (LBS) and navigation applications such as vehicular navigation and personal location require positioning capabilities in environments where LOS is not readily available, e.g., urban areas, indoors and dense forests. Such environments either block the signals completely or attenuate them to a power level that is 10-30 dB lower than the nominal signal power. This renders it impractical for a standard GPS receiver to acquire and maintain signal tracking, which causes discontinuous positioning in such environments. In order to address the issue of GPS tracking and positioning in degraded signal environments, a novel architecture for ultra-tight integration of a High Sensitivity GPS (HSGPS) receiver with an inertial navigation system (INS) is proposed herein. By enhancing receiver signal tracking loops through the use of optimal estimators and with external aiding, the capabilities of the receiver can be substantially improved. The proposed approach is distinct from the commonly used ultra-tightly coupled GPS/INS approaches and makes use of different tracking enhancement technologies used in typical HSGPS receivers, multi-channel cooperated receivers and the current ultra-tightly coupled GPS/INS methods. Furthermore, the effects of inertial measurement unit (IMU) quality, receiver oscillator noise and coherent integration time on weak signal tracking are also analyzed. Simulated test results in both static and dynamic testes show that, the designed INS-aided GPS receiver can track the incoming weak GPS signals down to 15 dB-Hz without carrier phase locked, or 25 dB-Hz with carrier phase locked. When there are multiple strong GPS signals in view, the other weak signals can be tracked down to 15 dB-Hz with carrier phase locked.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it