MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145280486 · doi:10.1109/tasl.2008.921756

Stochastic Analysis of the FXLMS-Based Narrowband Active Noise Control System

2008· article· en· W2145280486 on OpenAlexaff
Yegui Xiao, Akira Ikuta, Liying Ma, K. Khorasani

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrowbandActive noise controlControl theory (sociology)Noise (video)Least mean squares filterResidualMean squared errorStability (learning theory)Convergence (economics)Moving averageSteady state (chemistry)Computer scienceMathematicsAdaptive filterAlgorithmStatisticsControl (management)Channel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noise signals generated by rotating machines such as diesel engines, cutting machines, fans, etc., may be modeled as noisy sinusoidal signals which can be successfully suppressed by narrowband active noise control (ANC) systems. In this paper, statistical performance of such a conventional filtered-x LMS (FXLMS)-based narrowband ANC system is investigated in detail. First, difference equations governing the dynamics of the system are derived in terms of convergence of the mean and mean squared estimation errors for the discrete Fourier coefficients (DFCs) of the secondary source. Steady-state expressions for DFC estimation mean square error (MSE) as well as the residual noise power are then developed in closed forms. A stability bound for the FXLMS in the mean sense is also derived. Extensive simulations of various scenarios are performed to demonstrate the validity of the analytical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations89
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207