MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2145352521 · doi:10.1142/s0218339013400068

OPTIMAL VACCINATION STRATEGIES FOR AN INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC MODEL

2013· article· en· W2145352521 on OpenAlex
Qingwen Hu, Xingfu Zou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsVaccinationOptimal controlPer capitaEpidemic modelMathematical optimizationPopulationMathematicsMedicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an optimal control model for influenza vaccination strategies in an open population. The model is based on an extended Kermack–McKendrick model with the vaccination rate being a measurable function. The objective of this optimal control model is to describe the vaccination strategies so that the total cost arising from vaccination and infections is minimized. We show that the optimal control is a non-singular bang-bang control which has a finite number of switchings. A scheme for the solution of the optimal control problem is formulated using the shooting method. We also carry out numerical simulations to illustrate the general results and to examine the effects of parameters on the optimal vaccination strategy. The simulations show that the ratio of the per capita treatment cost and per capita vaccination cost has a significant effect on the optimal strategy, while the vaccination rate of the newly recruited class turns out to have less effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.293
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it