Bibliographic record
Abstract
The integration and exploitation of biological components onto micronanorobots and modern engineered microsystems such as Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS), lab-on-a-chip, or Micro-Total-Analysis Systems (μTAS) offer new possibilities. In particular, the flagellar motor found in many bacteria is a compact and extremely effective biological micro-actuator that is presently impossible to match with modern engineering techniques while requiring no electrical power to operate, a significant advantage especially in the conception of untethered microsystems. Previously, because chemotaxis-based bacteria such as E. Coli have been used for the exploitation of the flagellar motor, the number of possible applications have been very limited due to the absence of an effective method to control the motion of the bacteria. Controlling the direction of propulsion of the flagellar motor with computer software is demonstrated by exploiting magnetotaxis inherent in Magnetotactic Bacteria (MTB). The possibilities and advantages of this method are shown through a simple experiment where the controlled manipulation of microbeads is performed by MTB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".